SquadCast vs. Zencastr
The world of podcasting has exploded in recent years, with creators ranging from hobbyists to professionals seeking tools that deliver high-quality audio, ease of use, and reliable performance. Two platforms that consistently rise to the top of the conversation are SquadCast and Zencastr. Both are designed to simplify remote podcast recording, offering features like local track recording, cloud backups, and user-friendly interfaces. But which one is the better choice for your podcasting needs in 2025? In this review, we’ll compare SquadCast and Zencastr across key categories—audio quality, video capabilities, usability, pricing, reliability, and additional features—to help you decide.
SquadCast vs. Zencastr Review
Before diving into the nitty-gritty, let’s establish what each platform brings to the table.
SquadCast, launched in 2017, positions itself as a premium remote recording solution with a focus on studio-quality audio and video. It’s marketed toward serious podcasters and brands who prioritize reliability and professional output. SquadCast emphasizes its progressive upload technology, which ensures recordings are saved in real-time, minimizing the risk of data loss due to technical glitches.
Zencastr, introduced in 2016, has long been a favorite among podcasters for its simplicity and robust audio recording capabilities. Over the years, it has evolved into a more comprehensive platform, adding video recording, editing tools, and monetization options. Zencastr aims to be an all-in-one solution, appealing to beginners and seasoned creators alike.
Both tools have carved out strong reputations, but they cater to slightly different needs. Let’s break it down.
Audio Quality: The Heart of Podcasting
For any podcaster, audio quality is non-negotiable. A crisp, clear recording can make or break your show.
SquadCast prides itself on delivering “studio-quality” audio, a claim that holds up in practice. It records each participant’s audio locally in uncompressed WAV format (up to 48kHz), ensuring that internet hiccups don’t degrade the final product. SquadCast also includes built-in echo cancellation, which is a lifesaver if a guest isn’t using headphones. Users frequently praise its consistency, noting that audio drift—a common issue where tracks fall out of sync—is virtually nonexistent. This reliability makes SquadCast a go-to for podcasters who can’t afford to spend hours fixing sync issues in post-production.
Zencastr also excels in audio quality, offering local recording in WAV format (up to 48kHz, 16-bit on paid plans). Its audio is crisp and professional, rivaling SquadCast in most scenarios. However, Zencastr has historically struggled with audio drift, especially during long recordings. While the team claims to have resolved this issue with recent updates (as of 2025), some users still report occasional syncing challenges, particularly with free or older versions. On the plus side, Zencastr’s automatic gain control and post-production suite (available on paid plans) can enhance audio by reducing noise and balancing levels—features SquadCast lacks.
Verdict: SquadCast edges out Zencastr in raw audio reliability due to its drift-free performance and echo cancellation. Zencastr fights back with its post-production tools, but if pristine, unprocessed audio is your priority, SquadCast takes the lead.
Video Capabilities: Meeting the Demand for Visual Content
In 2025, video podcasting is more popular than ever, with platforms like YouTube driving demand for visual content. Both SquadCast and Zencastr have adapted, but their approaches differ.
SquadCast offers robust video recording alongside its audio prowess. It captures video locally at up to 1080p resolution, ensuring high quality regardless of internet stability. A standout feature is the “Green Room,” where hosts and guests can test audio and video settings before recording begins. SquadCast also supports up to 10 participants (one host plus nine guests), making it ideal for panel-style shows. However, it doesn’t yet offer 4K recording, which might disappoint creators aiming for ultra-high-definition output.
Zencastr entered the video game later, with its video recording feature initially launching in beta. By 2025, it’s fully integrated, offering 1080p video on paid plans (720p on the free tier). Zencastr supports unlimited guests, giving it an edge for large group recordings. It also includes a live editing soundboard and basic video editing tools, allowing you to trim clips or add effects during the session. However, its video quality is still a step behind competitors like Riverside.fm, and it lacks advanced features like screen sharing or live streaming.
Verdict: SquadCast wins for video reliability and the Green Room feature, making it smoother for multi-guest setups. Zencastr’s unlimited guests and editing tools are compelling, but its video feels less polished overall.
Usability: How Easy Are They to Use?
A tool’s interface can make or break the recording experience, especially for guests who may not be tech-savvy.
SquadCast boasts a clean, intuitive interface. Starting a session is as simple as creating a new recording and sending a link to guests. The Green Room adds a layer of preparation, letting everyone confirm their setup before hitting record. During the session, hosts can adjust gain levels manually, offering more control than Zencastr’s automatic adjustments. However, SquadCast’s limit of three guests on lower-tier plans (expanding to nine on higher tiers) can feel restrictive for some.
Zencastr keeps things equally straightforward. From the dashboard, you create an episode, name it, and share a link. There’s no Green Room, so you’ll need to troubleshoot audio and video issues on the fly. Zencastr’s interface is visually appealing and beginner-friendly, with minimal setup required. Guests join via a browser with a single click, and the platform handles the rest. The trade-off is less manual control—automatic gain can sometimes introduce distortion if not disabled.
Verdict: SquadCast’s Green Room and manual controls give it a slight edge for prepared, professional recordings. Zencastr shines for simplicity and quick setup, making it ideal for beginners or spontaneous sessions.
Pricing: Value for Money in 2025
Cost is a major factor when choosing a podcasting tool, especially for indie creators.
SquadCast operates on a subscription model with no free tier, though it offers a 7-day trial. As of March 2025, pricing starts at $20/month (or $220/year) for the Audio plan, which includes three guests and unlimited recording. The Video plan jumps to $40/month (or $440/year), adding video recording and support for up to nine guests. These prices position SquadCast as a premium option, targeting established podcasters willing to invest in quality.
Zencastr offers a free Hobbyist plan, which includes two guests, 8 hours of recording per month, and MP3 audio (128kbps). The Professional plan, at $20/month (or $18/month annually), unlocks unlimited guests, WAV audio, 10 hours of automatic post-production, and 1080p video. Higher tiers, like the Growth plan ($45/month), add hosting and monetization features. Zencastr’s free tier and lower entry price make it more accessible than SquadCast.
Verdict: Zencastr wins on affordability and flexibility, especially with its free plan. SquadCast’s higher cost is justified for those needing top-tier video and reliability, but it’s less budget-friendly.
Reliability: Can You Trust Them?
Technical glitches can ruin a recording session, so reliability is critical.
SquadCast shines here with its progressive upload feature. Audio and video files upload in real-time, so even if a browser crashes or a guest drops, your data is safe. Users report fewer connection issues compared to earlier versions, and the platform’s stability has improved significantly by 2025. Occasional bugs still pop up, but they’re rare.
Zencastr has made strides in reliability, fixing past issues like drift and dropped recordings. Its cloud backup system ensures files are saved post-session, but uploads only begin after recording ends—unlike SquadCast’s real-time approach. This leaves a small window of vulnerability if something goes wrong before the upload completes. Downtime complaints have decreased, but Zencastr’s reputation still carries some baggage from earlier instability.
Verdict: SquadCast takes the crown for reliability thanks to progressive uploads and a stronger track record in 2025.
Additional Features: What Else Do They Offer?
Beyond core recording, extra features can sway your decision.
SquadCast keeps it lean, focusing on recording quality. Its Green Room and manual gain control are highlights, but it lacks built-in editing, hosting, or monetization tools. This minimalist approach works if you already have a post-production workflow but may feel limiting otherwise.
Zencastr goes broader, offering automatic post-production (noise reduction, leveling), a live soundboard, and basic editing tools. It also includes hosting and a Creator Network for monetization, connecting podcasters with advertisers. These additions make Zencastr a more holistic platform, reducing reliance on external software.
Verdict: Zencastr’s all-in-one approach outshines SquadCast’s narrower focus, especially for creators seeking an integrated solution.
Strengths and Weaknesses
SquadCast Strengths:
- Exceptional audio and video reliability
- Progressive uploads minimize data loss
- Green Room enhances session prep
- Manual gain control for precision
SquadCast Weaknesses:
- No free tier, higher cost
- Limited to 9 guests (on top plan)
- Lacks editing or hosting features
Zencastr Strengths:
- Free tier for beginners
- Unlimited guests on paid plans
- Post-production and editing tools
- Hosting and monetization options
Zencastr Weaknesses:
- Past reliability issues linger
- Video quality lags behind competitors
- Automatic gain can distort audio
Who Should Choose SquadCast?
SquadCast is ideal for serious podcasters who prioritize reliability and quality above all else. If you record long sessions, need video alongside audio, and have a budget to match, SquadCast delivers a polished experience. It’s best for established creators or brands who already handle editing and hosting elsewhere.
Who Should Choose Zencastr?
Zencastr suits a wider range of podcasters, from beginners to pros. Its free tier and lower entry price make it accessible, while its all-in-one features appeal to those wanting a streamlined workflow. If you’re on a budget, need unlimited guests, or prefer built-in editing, Zencastr is your pick.
Final Verdict: SquadCast vs. Zencastr in 2025
Choosing between SquadCast and Zencastr depends on your priorities. SquadCast excels in reliability, audio-video quality, and professional polish, making it the premium choice for creators who can afford it. Zencastr offers greater flexibility, affordability, and a broader feature set, positioning it as the versatile all-rounder.
For raw recording quality and peace of mind, SquadCast is the winner. For value, accessibility, and an integrated podcasting experience, Zencastr takes the edge. In 2025, both are excellent tools—your decision hinges on budget, scale, and workflow preferences. Try their trials, test with your setup, and see which feels right for your show.
